With more realistic values the Fish Market in CE 120 production per field with +80 happiness looks far more appealing that Logistics Centers.īut with the numbers un-adjusted for 2 lane roads it comes off as obvious that Logistics Center is a direct upgrade to the Fish Market 137.9 vs 120, and the Business Centers become a near must build as its value is so much higher that the Fish Market 151.2 and for those that can't afford the loss of happiness they would build Logistics Centers over Fish Markets not realizing that they would get more on a per field basis from the Fish Markets. Wouldn't it be less misleading to just calculate the numbers assuming everyone is optimally placing the buildings using the short side for 2-lane connections ( ex Greenhouse Complex 5/3 would be a 6/3 ) and then have a disclaimer "Requires 2-lane roads, so supplies and population per space may be slightly less depending on orientation"? It seems that a good amount of people don't realize the numbers don't take roads into account and the drop in actual value can be more than slight.īusiness Center from CE looses 1/6th of its value when roads are taken into account dropping from 151 to 126, Logistics Center drops from 137.9 to either 110.3 or 118.2. Why do you use the disclaimer on buildings "Requires 2-lane roads, so supplies and population per space will be slightly less than the other buildings" then use calculations that don't take into consideration the 2 lane road on either orientation. ![]() ** Each building with this bonus will boost either the attack for the attacking army or the defense of the defending army ![]() * Requires 2-lane roads (NOT factored into the "per space" columns) ARCTIC FUTURE II | Recruiting time: 4h | 5th slot: 120
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |